Anti Gun Hypocrites
   Major General
Points: 812
|
Feb 16, 2007 2:13 pm
I was thinking about it recently about how many hardcore gun grabbers, break gun laws. 1. Rosie O'Donnell, the woman attacked Tom Selleck about his involvement with the NRA. She once said that anyone who owns a gun should be in jial. But wait, she wanted an ARMED bodyguard for her children. 2. Sarah Brady broke one of the very laws she had enforced. She bought a 30 06 hunting rifle for her son, who was 19 at the time. She bought a gun for another adult illegally. So anyone have any more. |
  Sergeant Major of the Army
Points: 28
|
Jun 7, 2007 6:11 pm
Jollyroger I can't think of any examples but I know there are many. It seems that all the people that want to take our guns Think and act as though the law doesn't apply to them. They are talking out both sides of there mouths, They show the true meaning of hypocrisy. United we Stand and Divided we Fall |
  Major
Points: 200
|
Jul 2, 2007 5:02 pm
people who are trying to take our guns and the costitutions because in the constitution one of the bills say right to bare arms so if they did they will shred the constitution and I am against people who are against people who don't like guns because up here in Alaska we need guns to get our animals and deefense so ya i say the same with yiou guys |
 Lieutenant Colonel
Points: 268
|
Jul 6, 2007 9:51 pm
You know guys, the anti gun people are coming out from under the woodwork right and left. Now we have OSHA who is pushing a new ruling OSHA-2007-0032 that would put unreal regulations on the explosive and ammunition industry. The result would be the manufactures would have to meet these regulations with great added cost to them, which would mean very high prices to the consumer who wanted to buy ammo. This regulation would greatly affect us in a material way,the retail sector of the firearms and ammunition industry, productivity, competition and jobs. But, bottom line, it would make getting ammo difficult and very, very expensive. When will these anti gun people let up? Probably never, and with the coming Presidential election coming in 2008 it could get even worse. I hope all who own guns wake up and start writing and calling their elected officials and make their positions known. We are living in a not so secure times. We do not have the security or peace that we had even 20 years ago. We have religious Islamic folks wanting to destroy our country and put us under Sari Law, and throw out the U.S. Constitution. All the while many Republicans and Democrates alike are sound asleep at the wheel. September 11th, 2001 was not that long ago, yet, many have already forgotten what the intent was. To destroy us! That same intent is valid for these people even today. So, gun owners of America, we cannot be caught with our pants down and unarmed with no ammo. We need to be prepared to support and defend ourselves and our country at any time. This regulation by OSHA isn't talked about in the media, but, what gun issue is? So, gun owners lets be dilligent and stop all anti gun lobbyist and people who are trying to sneak a bill and regulations through without the public voting on whether they are legitimate or not. |
  First Lieutenant
Points: 92
|
Jul 8, 2007 1:58 am
Sadly, even today, even in this nation we have Marxist leaders. The three principles of communism according to the theory of Carl Marx are as follows. For communism to succeed it must have, 1. A progressive taxation according to income. 2. The right to own property must be removed. 3. The popululation must not be allowed to have weapons. Folks, we already have a progressive tax system, and our right to own property is no longer safe with "Imminate Domain" being enforced in most communities. We cannot "Allow" these communist leaders like Hillary Clinton and friends rob us of our right to defend ourselves against such terrorism. There was a reason the original drafters of the Constitution, made the deliberate effort of putting in the second ammendment. It was to provide protection for the citizens, from an overzelous government, much like the Brittish they had just overcome. This right to bear arms, to form a militia quickly, clearly indicates that the purpose for this ammendment was for self defense agaist such people. Not just for sport hunting and sport shooting contests. That is why they want to eliminate "YOUR RIGHT" to bear arms, or at the least, make it not worth the effort to aquire and own them. |
|
Major
Points: 200
|
Jul 9, 2007 3:37 pm
but yet again if u look in the constitution it is a bill of rights to rights to bare arms b/c our founding fathers of the paper knew in the future to have every1 bare arms by either self or a national gaurd that has been here when america became a country |
  Second Lieutenant
Points: 47
|
Jul 19, 2007 5:28 am
you don't have to be in the states to be dogged by hypocrites over here in New Zealand we have our share of tree hugging,sandle wearing, sprout eating,non smoking, greenies who,in my humble opinion,should be sent some where they will find out what our brave young men and women are having to do and then they might find a greater knowlage of the importance of firearms in civilian hands |
|
Major General
Points: 812
|
Jul 19, 2007 12:36 pm
Exactly think about any anti gun president is a hypocrite, they're secret carries automatic handguns with what I guarantee is over ten round capacity. Hell they carry sub machine guns from MP5ks in briefcases to P90s under their coats. Suggest to an anti gun President to disarm their Secret Service boys, I picture the answer now, "Well, uhm, the thing is, uhm, that uhm I'm a public figure, you see uhm, that puts my life at risk, uhm." While I might not have an exact figure on the number of Presidents, Prime Minister, and other high politicians that have been assasinated I guarantee you it's less than the people they disarm every year. "We deal in Lead, friend." Steve Mcqueen from the Magnificent Seven. |